Psychological Science in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversy
I will be using this book for:
1 total vote

Psychological Science in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversy

by Scott O. Lilienfeld, Jennifer L. Skeem, Kevin S. Douglas

Law Psychology
1 Star 2 Star 3 Star 4 Star 5 Star
0.0 out of 5 stars (0 ratings)

This volume examines the role of psychological research in legal settings, presenting areas of scientific agreement and ongoing debate relevant to the courtroom.

About This Book

Psychological Science in the Courtroom explores how psychological research informs legal processes and decision-making.

The book addresses both established findings and areas of controversy within forensic psychology.

Contributors examine the application of psychological science to courtroom procedures and evidence evaluation.

Topics include the reliability of expert testimony and the challenges of integrating science with legal standards.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this book!


Write a Review
I will be using this book for:
1 total vote