Psychological Science in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversy
I will be using this book for:
1 total vote

Psychological Science in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversy

by Scott O. Lilienfeld, Jennifer L. Skeem, Kevin S. Douglas

Law Psychology
1 Star 2 Star 3 Star 4 Star 5 Star
0.0 out of 5 stars (0 ratings)

Psychological Science in the Courtroom explores how psychological research intersects with legal proceedings. Focusing on both consensus and controversy, the book offers a broad examination of scientific knowledge as it relates to courtroom contexts, making it relevant to readers of psychology, law, and forensic science.

About This Book

This book examines the relationship between psychological science and the courtroom.

It considers areas where research and professional understanding have reached consensus.

It also addresses controversies surrounding the interpretation and application of psychological knowledge in legal settings.

The volume is suited to readers interested in psychology, law, and the use of scientific evidence in court.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this book!


Write a Review
I will be using this book for:
1 total vote